Judicial Review is a doctrine that believes that the Constitution of a country confers a set of powers to the Judiciary. These powers, in effect, overlap with that of the Executive and/or the legislature. It is a feature that is found in many democracies such as India, the United States, Australia, Canada, European Union, Denmark, South Africa etc. In India, some, though not all, of the powers that come under the Judicial Review and are exercised by the Supreme Court and High Courts are mentioned in the Constitution. The other that are not mentioned come from a general misunderstanding of the doctrine. In other countries, such as Australia, it is codified in the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977.
Under the doctrine of Judicial Review, the Judicial authorities can declare a law, an act or an administrative action as void for not complying with the constitution or superseding law. It is thus seen as an important feature of the Principle of Checks and Balances. The underpinning of the doctrine is a belief that neither the Parliament (Law-making body) nor the executive is supreme. The purpose of Judicial Review is to demarcate the powers of the Legislative and the Executive Branches of the State.
In India, the Judicial Review pertains to the powers of the Supreme Court and the High Courts can be classified into the following:
Of the above three, the power to review the Constitutional Amendments has been the most interesting and contentious at the same time. The power is not derived from any constitutional provision but a doctrine which is unique to India. Under this power, the Supreme Court can invalidate any constitutional amendment if it violates the Basic Structure of the Constitution.
Moreover, the Basic Structure remains uncodified and what constitutes it has been under debate since its very inception. The Supreme Court has, time and again, updated what constitutes the Basic Structure and what does not. The power of the Supreme Court and High Courts to exercise Judicial Review is also a part of the Basic Structure, as ruled by the top court in Minerva Mills case (1980).
Secondly, power concerning Union, State and Local Legislation is granted to the Judiciary by the Constitution itself. For instance, Article 13 of the Constitution of India says that all laws that go against the Fundamental Rights are void.
In the third case, regarding Judicial Review over Administrative Actions, both the statutory and non-statutory administrative actions come under its purview. In both cases, if the action violates the constitution, articles 14, 19, 29, 30, 301 etc come into play. As per Justice Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, the three cases in which the courts can exercise judicial review of administrative actions are:
One of the first cases in the Supreme Court that saw the top court exercise its powers of Judicial Review was the State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan (commonly known as the Champakam Dorairajan case). The top court upheld Champakam Dorairajan’s petition and annulled the reservation of backward castes introduced by the State Government of Madras. The ruling led the Union Government to amend the Constitution to introduce the Ninth Schedule that allowed the Union and State governments to make special provisions that cannot be challenged in the courts.
As a result of the robust judicial practices including Judicial Review, the Supreme Court of India is considered the ‘Strongest Court in the World’.
Judicial Review has become a mainstay of many well-functioning democracies. It has had a major role in preventing the executive from overstretching its powers or prom legislatures in exercising the tyranny of the majority.
The following are the criticisms of Judicial Review
The Ninth Schedule is one of the most controversial parts of the Indian Constitution. It consists of laws that violate one or more Fundamental Rights but are immune from judicial review for being progressive and for the upliftment of backward classes. These laws cannot be challenged before the courts for violating their fundamental rights. The reason why this schedule deserves its section in this article is because of the scope of its criticism
It has been said that a Constitution is a living law and not a fossil. The doctrine of Judicial Review gives life to a constitution and interprets it according to the times, without which the Constitution will become mere words. It is because of Judicial Review that the Supreme Court jealously guards the Fundamental Rights of India’s citizens. It is one of the features that determine the health of the constitution. Although it is derived from the tradition of legal constitutionalism, it has far surpassed it. The developments in several decades of judicial processes have made Judicial Review a permanent feature albeit an unwritten one.
During the worldwide fall of Communism, beginning in the 1980s, the West was gripped by…
Edward Hallett Carr is perhaps the greatest and most authentic authority when it comes to…
“The Army is the nation and the nation is with the Army”, COAS General Ashfaq…
Few scholarly works have modest beginnings but have become one of the most renowned seminal…
Few people in the USSR saw the end of the Cold War as a setback…
In 1921, Vladimir Lenin initiated a new economic agenda for the Soviet Union, which had…